Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
Categories
Search


Advanced Search
Article Options
Sponsored Links

 
 »  Home  »  Research  »  Lifter Experiments  »  Making Lifters Efficient with UV
Making Lifters Efficient with UV
By Lifters & Biefeld-Brown | Published  10/18/2002 | Lifter Experiments | Rating:
Lifters & Biefeld-Brown
American Antigravity has been a leader in Lifter research since 2002, and we're proud to showcase our work to help benefit the thousands of experimenters involved with studying the Biefeld-Brown Effect. Whether you're just getting started, or working diligently on advanced concepts, we're sure that our Lifter research will be a valuable asset to your own endeavors. 

View all articles by Lifters & Biefeld-Brown
Ultraviolet Provides Greater Power & Efficiency

For decades the complaint about Ion-Wind Propulsion has centered on the relatively poor thrust-output and efficiency that it provides. While the Biefeld-Brown Effect has become a major avenue for hopeful scientists to seek entirely new types of efficiency, Ion-Wind research itself has languished in obscurity, resulting in no progress over time in making this type of propulsion technology more efficient. This article will not focus on the Biefeld-Brown Effect, but instead on the idea of Ultraviolet-PreIonization as a tool to enhance Lifter performance by lowering the operating voltage.

Using Saviour’s equations, a baseline voltage of 30kv from the emitter to the collector should produce an overall Lifter performance of 1 g/ Watt, and an ion-transport speed of 1.72 cm^2/Vsec. These values match established norms (calculated assuming a negative-output terminal to maximize ion-mass). Having established a baseline to compare against, consider what happens when the value of 115 volts (rectified to DC) is used instead of 30,000. The overall performance changes to 324.6 g/ Watt, which is equivalent to nearly 1 pound per watt, or about 746 pounds per horsepower).

The conductivity of a lightning channel – or any atmospheric plasma – is in fact greater than the conductivity of an equal volume of copper wire. This means that by using the appropriate wavelengths of ultraviolet radiation, it is possible to manipulate and direct low-voltage currents of electricity through the atmosphere in the same manner that they are directed through a circuit board.

Hence, instead of requiring 30 kilovolts of electricity to stimulate ion-production and conduction-charge transfer; a much greater amount of electricity can be transferred at a much lower voltage without the side-effects associated with the traditional Biefeld-Brown and Ion-Wind technologies through the intermediary use of UV radiation to modify the conductivity properties of air.

Using Saviour’s equations to demonstrate the increase in efficiency with a greatly reduced voltage helps to support the notion that lowering the voltage below the ionization threshold would provide attainable requirements for input power-levels, as well as reduce the voltage below the point where negative X-ray and ionic effects occur. However, Saviour’s equations tend to also breakdown with lower values, because the traditional community considers it common sense that “Ion-Wind” cannot exists without ionizing potentials.

PDF Link: UV-Stimulated PreIonization
File Size: 182kb (PDF 7)


How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent

Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Add comment
Related Links
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Totally rocks!!
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Erik)
    Rating
    I'm not entirely convinced that ion wind is necessary, or even responsible for the propulsion. I noticed that Jean Louis Naudin did an experiment where the wire was enclosed in a glass envelope, thus preventing or limiting the normal ionisation. I've also seen videos of a lifter rotating on a axle which was immersed in oil and continued to rotate with the electrodes in the oil (and hence insulated by the oil). I find it difficult to imagine any ions travelling through the oil, and even if there are then they are surely quantum particles as opposed to electrons or nuclei.

    My personal suspicion is that the propulsion results from distortion of the background quantum flux energies. After all, what is electricity and magnetism? Simply aligned and coherent quantum energies. Remember that all matter is seething with massive electric and magnetic fields. Even your office desk probably has more magnetic energy in it than a state of the art neodynium magnet, but the reason you can't access or detect this energy is because every particle in the desk is generating electric and magnetic field lines in pseudo-random directions. I.e. the field lines are so misaligned that destructive interference causes them to cancel out, creating an overall net magnetic field which us humans have arbitarily labelled as zero (although probably isn't quite zero in an absolute sense). We create accessible electric and magnetic fields by taking the chaotic fields which already exist and aligning them so that the field lines reinforce each other rather than cancel out. I suspect this antigravity thing is something similar. The high voltages are stressing the quantum flux and aligning fields or energies in such a way to create physical movement. Other experimenters talk about extracting energy from space by using high voltages to create such stresses.

    Where did you get the information about x-rays from lifters? Are you saying there's a radiation danger in these experiments? I don't want to go irradiating myself!
     
Submit Comment