Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
Categories
Search


Advanced Search
Article Options
Sponsored Links

 
 »  Home  »  Feature Articles  »  Notes on a Measured Gravito-Magnetic London Moment
Notes on a Measured Gravito-Magnetic London Moment
By Gary Stephenson | Published  03/30/2006 | Feature Articles | Rating:
Gary Stephenson
Gary's a career aerospace-engineer with a passion for High-Frequency Gravitational Wave research. He frequently collaborates with Dr. Robert Baker and the GravWave Team on HFGW projects, including some recent work in HFGW communications theory & experimental design. 

View all articles by Gary Stephenson
As Measured and Formulated by Tajmar & de Matos

An announcement of the first laboratory measurement of the Gravito-Magnetic London Moment was made by the European Space Agency (ESA) on March 23rd, 2006. The laboratory work was performed at the ARC Seibersdorf Reseach organization in Seibersdorf Austria under the direction of Dr M. Tajmar, with theoretical support provided by Dr. C.J. de Matos at ESA-HQ in Paris, France.
 
What was actually measured? The first repeatable generation of a gravitational field in the lab. The effect was successfully reproduced over 200 times and is described in reference.
 
More specifically, a tangential acceleration field was measured on the inside of a rotating superconductor. The largest effect was during sharp accelerations and decelerations of the rotating superconductor. With a Niobium superconductor, the application of a tangential acceleration to the disk of 1500 rad/s^2 resulted in an acceleration field outside of the disk of 100uG, 30 orders of magnitude larger than predicted by classical general relativity. Signal to noise ratios of the accelerometers were better than 3:1, and differential signals (derived with reference accelerometers) were used for bias removal.
 
We can draw the following conclusions:

• A gravitational field has been created in the laboratory. It is 30 orders of magnitude larger than predicted by general relativity. If it is magnified another 4 orders of magnitude it will provide lift, i.e. field propulsion.
 
• A theoretical paper was also written that explains the effect in terms of a frame dragging field that is produced by the lagging of gravito-photons inside the bulk of the SC.
 
• The resultant gravitational field can extend to outside the superconductor, and may therefore be used to “engineer the vacuum” in a variety of useful ways, including communication and propulsion applications.



File Size: 89kb (PDF 7)
PDF Link: Notes on a Measured Gravito-Magnetic London Moment

Related: Gary Stephenson Video Interview, ESA: Towards a New Test of General Relativity?, Martin Tajmar Homepage, Martin Tajmar Video Interview (STAIF 2006) Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment, Local Photon and Graviton Mass and its Consequences


How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent

Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Add comment
Related Links
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Ken)
    Rating
    The announcement of the first laboratory measurement of the Gravito-Magnetic London Moment made by the European Space Agency (ESA) on March 23rd, 2006, is HOISTORIC!
    ESA is MAJOR Institution. They can't say this is some small operations that has NO CREDABLITY. Maybe now they will believe their is some connection with SPINNING, ELECTROMAGNETISN and GRAVITY.

    All these PAPERS show SPINNING, ELECTROMAGNETISN and GRAVITY connection:
    http://aias.us/pub/Evans%20Equations%20of%20Unified%20Field%20Theory%20Rev%203.pdf

    NASA Papers:
    ------------
    http://history.nasa.gov/SP-345/ch8.htm
    http://trs.nis.nasa.gov/archive/00000618/01/tm212286.pdf
    http://lep694.gsfc.nasa.gov/lepedu/whyspin.html


     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    The gravito-magnetic "space race" has begun....looks
    like the Europeans (ESA) are leaving NASA in the dust!
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by nixter)
    Rating
    Can't help but think that this tech has already been developed by govermment "agencies", and that the genie has just been let out of the bottle.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Michael Houst)
    Rating
    MRIs typically use 7 Tesla magnets. I understand Oregon State University recently received a 12 Tesla unit with a 31 centimeter bore.; that ran them $1.75 million dollars.

    I also understand that Florida State University has a 35 Tesla magnet, and Los Alamos has both a 50 and a 60 Tesla magnets, although I don;t know if they are constant field or pulsed magnets.

    Thing is, the Heim-Droscher-Hauser papers all say that you need a 20 to 25 Tesla field to lift spacecraft, and generate the dimensional field. Seems to me that we have this capability now (and have probably had it for over a decade). I find it hard to beleive that DARPA, or another 'BLACK" research programs of the US haven't already done significant experiments in this area.

    Which begs the questions: "Why hasn't a government lab come out to say that the theory is wrong?" and "If the theory is right, how long have they known about it, and what have they done with the technology from it?"

    A 12 Tesla MRI unit for only 1.75 Million means that they should be able to produce a three motor system space craft for what it cost to produce the first Apollo mission and still have money left over.

    Heck, if it's that cheap then every country in the world could afford one, and most of the fortune 500 companies for that matter.

    But only if the technology became public.
     
Submit Comment