Community of Mind
A lot of what I do on a day to day basis consists of talking to experts in the field of gravity research – not only am I interested in learning more about the formal work that they’ve done, but I also like to hear about their thoughts and opinions as to “what makes gravity tick” – ie: the gut feelings that they have about what works and doesn’t in the realm of antigravity research. I’ve talked to a very diverse group of people working on many aspects of this technology – from Tom Bearden on the electronics and engineering side of things to Bob Lazar with relation to his supposed work on UFO systems for the government in the late 80’s. I’ve talked to a diverse mixture of ‘formal scientists’, inventors, and other people with input on the subject and expertise to give them valuable input. What I’ve learned doesn’t come from any one single source, but is instead a composite from a group of different people working towards a singular goal – they compose a “community of mind” that lends its expertise to moving the goal of antigravity research forward.

The Limits of Science
In the interest of fairness, I should state the Antigravity research really falls outside of conventional science. A lot of new people to AG research (including the ‘general interest’ segment of the public) have the impression that we’re opposed to conventional scientific establishment or government research efforts, but this isn’t true – the research that’s being done in the open-source community is really outside of the scope of ‘big-science’ and government-sponsored efforts, which is why it limits our ability to work with them on these projects.

There are two main theories that would seem to be the path for ‘big science’ in the formal community to tie in with Antigravity research – Quantum Theory and Relativity Theory. As I’ve stated in the past, the problem is that neither of these really provides the type of coverage that we need to move forward with a theory that promotes Antigravity as an extension of conventional science.

One of the main problems here is simply observational – thus far, devices that have produced an observable Antigravity effect have been few and far between, which makes it difficult for the conventional scientific community to really engage itself in learning about Antigravity and tying that knowledge back into conventional theory in terms of measurable theoretical models.

Quantum Theory
I saw a lecture on the internet by Dr. Richard Feynman last week in which he describes gravity as really falling outside of the confines of Quantum Theory due to the fact that its so much weaker than the other forces that it isn’t measurable on Quantum levels (ie: in single particle interactions). This limitation of the science has limited the ability of quantum-theory researchers to really include gravity research into their model of science, although some newer theorists are making great strides in this area.

One of the big proponents of an extension of quantum mechanics that would include a model for gravity (allowing gravity shielding) is Dr. Ning Li, formerly of the University of Huntsville. Her team, formerly part of the University but now working as an independent research group in a startup-company has been working with a method of creating what she calls “AC-Gravity” that is related to the rotating superconductor experiments conducted by Eugene Podkletnov at Tampere, Finland in 1992.

Podkletnov noticed that smoke from a senior-researcher’s pipe traveled in a column up towards the ceiling when his rotating superconductor apparatus was operated under certain conditions, and after careful work confirming this effect he attempted to publish a document suggesting that a “gravitational-shielding” effect was happening. Despite protest by the scientific community, Dr. Ning Li stepped forward nearly a year later to claim that she’d published a paper that had predicted his results nearly 2 years before he’s obtained them.

Ning Li is now working in a secret-environment on her own experiments involving rotating superconductors, and from my research I’ve learned that she’s getting results – in fact, in a carefully-written communiqué that I received from her in early 2003 she claimed that her team was able to produce over 11 kilowatts of “AC-Gravity” effect. This is the last that I’ve heard from her on the subject, and I suspect that her startup-company’s financiers have restrained her from wanton publishing of her day-to-day research results.

Relativity Theory
Two particles traveling parallel to each other will not have an interaction between their magnetic fields, despite a conventional field-interaction between these particles if they aren’t traveling on parallel paths. This was a section of a textbook on “relativity theory applied to magnetism” in a physics text that I own that helped me to realize that Relativity theory offers more leverage into gravity research than I’d originally thought. What it means is that magnetism, which is generally considered to be a fundamental force, is really nothing more than the interaction of the electrical fields of moving particles. Depending on how the particles are moving, this magnetic force may not even exist …

Decades after his death, the genius of Einstein’s theory of Relativity continues to provide direction into gravity and Antigravity research. In another recently published article, the author mentions that the gravitational field of the sun is slightly larger due to the heat (kinetic energy) of its constituent atoms. This is a consequence of Relativity theory, in this case related to the relative mass of a traveling particle and how it is related to the gravitational field that it creates around itself (more mass = larger displacement of the time-space continuum).