By JT Davenport

Hi Tim! It's been a while since I've talked with you, more like a year or longer.

However, once the news broke about the Hyperspace drive experimant which has been postulated by Drosher, et al. I've been wondering about such things as the HUTCHINSON effect and Podkletnov's gravity beam weapon and possibly the work which has been done by the Hungarians and who knows, perhaps even the LIFTER CELLS ( BIEFELD /BROWN effect ) being explained by the HEIM / DROSHER theory of HYPER SPACE.

I'm assuming you'd already read up on it and are aware that HEIM postulated the existence of a GRAVITOPHOTON. I thought their theories just might explain these phenomina.

I wonder if the high-speed rotating magnetic fields relate at all SEARL's work?? I'd forgotten about that one. Now, Tim, when it comes to PODKLETNOV's work with the gravity beam, he says it uses a high voltage arc in conjunction with his superconducting magnet. If his work can be explained by means of the Heim/Drosher theory, then why can't you use a high voltage arc in place of the E-M field coil??

Have you read the theoretical work written by Dr. A.C. HOLT who was working at the LBJ NASA center in HOUSTON way back in the 1970s. What he postulated was a PLASMA torus maintained by x-ray lasers to create an antigravitic effect. He predicted there would be a 15% slowing of time by this means as well. He also said there would be an excess of energy due to a feedback along the way. His intellectual effort was really quite interesting to read. And, reminds me sort of the work being done by the group in HUNGARY.

While I'm on the subject, why do they use MERCURY instead of something else??

I've read where an ancient civilization used MERCURY as a propulsion method. They're supposed to have been able to go to the moon and back with no problem. The first time I read about MERCURY being used for propulsion I was surprised. I guess the more we advance, the more we realize we're going where we've already been!!! I wonder what we'll find on MARS??!!

  By the way, Dr. Holt's work IS a really GOOD read.
  O.K. I don't know what you mean about TORSION as a propulsion method unless I know of it under a different name which is possible. Perhaps you can give me some more info??!!!

I did my best to read as much as I could on SEARL and his craft. He said that only about one of every three worked. He also said that if you placed a candle inside the wooden framework and one outside the framework, the one inside would go out while the one outside would continue to burn. He didn't have an answer for that but, I think I do. It goes back to what some of PODKLETNOV's peer review members said... They said that there should be a sort of field developed and that the gasses inside it would be forced to the inside of the field and then forcibly ejected from the field. The result would be a vacuum inside. If you transpose this to SEARL's work then it would make sense that the candle inside would go out if a vacuum was formed.

SEARL also said that when you turned the generator on full volume, it would yank the ground below the craft up with it when it went up into the air!!

I just don't understand why you'd need to have a device as complicated as what SEARL made. I mean there was a LOT of extra weight in all of those rollers and counter rotating rings.

Unless I'm mistaken, There was a RUSSIAN who made a SEARL generator that used only ONE circular ring system and supposedly, he achieved much of the same results as SEARL did.

So far, my attempts to get a LIFTER to work with my 35,000 volt DC generator hasn't been fruitfull. We did get coronal discharge but, that was all. One of these days I'll try it with a 50,000 V DC generator.

Right now, I need to get a good job because I've gotten tired of being retired ( that sounded pretty funny, didn't it???!!! LOL!!! ) and also I now have some projects which will require a LOT of money to accomplish so, it looks like I'm going back into the job market. J.T.

You know, the more I look at the requirements for this HYPERSPACE DRIVE, the more it begins to look like the flying saucers that were used in most of our 1950s and 1960s Sci-Fi movies such as " FORBIDDEN PLANET " and, " EARTH vs. THE FLYING SAUCERS " These two movies seem to be particularly on the money!! I just find this to be quite interesting.

I wonder IF it would be possible to make a working model of this HYPERSPACE DRIVE postulated by HEIM/ DROSHER, et al.?? Let's see, why don't you try to produce one or, at least make a challenge to all who are out there to see if someone out there can actually produce a working model which MUST be flown in PUBLIC with you and others present!!

 Let's see, we had the Space X prize so, why not call this one the HS - X- Prize!! Of course, I have no way of funding this project but, who knows... the funding might come along just like the Space X funding did!!! I think where there's a DARE, our nation's people are quite daring and WILL take up the challenge. LEt's make this " X " prize race one that doesn't allow anything to be entered which uses an expellant to propel the craft!!!! What do you think???

Oh, I almost forgot, I know a man in the UK who is attempting to get a SUBORBITER spaceplane built. His name is Dr. Ray Wright. Are you interested in adding his organization to your list of click on headliners?? Right now he's looking for a money backer. He already has a concept drawing and he's spoken with a public relations company about how to get this promoted.