Lifter-4 Outdoor Performance

Outdoor testing of the Lifter 4 demonstrated some of the many strengths of the 4-foot long, multi-cell design. The Lifter 4 displayed good thrust and payload capacity, and was stable enough to allow tethered operation at a full 8-feet off the test-surface.

Lifter4 in action outdoors. View of the underside of the Lifter 4, tethered at 10-feet from the ground. Doug Starfield standing next to the Lifter 4 during a demonstration. Wired Magazine's Clive Thompson standing behind the Lifter4. Fuji-TV camera crew filming Lifter for TV.


 



Advanced Lifters

Learn about the Lifter 4, Lifter-9, and the L3-Microcell lifters. These are all advanced designs that feature composite structures and high-thrust levels.

Lifter-4 Indoor
Lifter-9 Overview
Lifter-9 Construction
Lifter-3 Microcell


Performance Notes

The Lifter4 was tested outdoors on July 10th by American Antigravity as part of a demonstration for Wired-Magazine reporter Clive-Thompson.

 

The demonstration was highly successful, and achieved a new height-record for stable tethered-flight at over 8 feet!

 

Lifter 4 Outdoor Video

View the mpeg-format Lifter 4 outdoor experiment video!

Click Here

 

Lifter 4 Indoor Video

View the mpeg-format Lifter 4 indoor experiment video!

Click Here

 

Lifter 4 Video Clip

This clip shows the lifter tethered at a height of approximately 8 feet. This was taken with a camera-pan around the Lifter to provide perspective.

8-foot Tethered Height

This photo shows the Lifter 4 photographed from below at a tethered height of 8 feet from the test-surface. click here

Flight-Duration Tests

This photo shows the Lifter 4 levitating over the deck during testing, during an outdoor test lasting over 1 hour in duration. click here

Outdoor Performance

Despite being buffetted by cross winds and having to deal with several power-loss situations resulting from humidity, the Lifter4 performed remarkably well in an uncontrolled environment.

Outdoor Graphic 1 Outdoor Graphic 2 Outdoor Graphic 3 Outdoor Graphic 4 Outdoor Graphic 5


The Lifter 4 Power-Supply

The Lifter 4 outdoor tests were performed using the Hvolt series power-supply from Information Unlimited. The critical voltage required to achieve lift is 17.5 kV -- however, increasing the voltage correlates with an increase in thrust.

The Lifter 4 uses slightly more current than the Lifter 3 does -- when powered by the 100kV Hvolt 100 power supply, the current draw for the Lifter 4 is between 3.5 and 4 milliamps -- for the Lifter 3 the current draw is between 2 and 3.5 milliamps.

For additional information about the Hvolt series power-supplies, visit the Information Unlimited website. Click here

Lifter 4 Payload Capacity

As tested both indoors and out, the Lifter 4 was capable of carrying approximately 1 pound of payload when under 250 watts of power. This payload is substantially-greater than previous Lifter experiments at American Antigravity, primarily due to the increased size and thrust-producing area of the Lifter 4.

In this case, some of the factors that contributed significantly to the higher-payload capability include:

- -
Greater combined length of wire-foil thrust-producing area.
- - Longer sections to reduce electrostatic losses near each post..
- - Higher width/height ratio to provide increased stability.
- - 50-gauge corona wire to enhance hv charge-transfer.

Lifter 4 Efficiency Information

Operating at approximately 250-watts of power from the Hvolt 100 power-supply (2.5 mA at 100kV), the Lifter 4 has a maximum capacity of 1 pound, including both the payload and Lifter 4 combined weight.

As a result of these figures, the efficiency of the Lifter 4 is currently still low, but significantly better than in previous experiments. As 250-watts is approximately 1/3 of a horsepower (1 horsepower = 746 watts), the Lifter 4 then has a power-to-weight-ratio of 3 pounds per horsepower.

While an efficiency at 3 pounds per horsepower is very low, it would in theory be able to lift a 200 pound adult male using only 66 horsepower. This assumes an efficiency of conversion from the primary power-source (most likely a combustion-based engine) to high-voltage current at 100% -- realistically the conversion between these two would be considerably lower.

Bearing in mind that the true efficiency will be far below the theoretical limit, it is also wise to remember that in very general terms the Lifter becomes more efficient with larger designs -- therefore a vehicle-sized Lifter may be able to be accomplished within the near future, if resources can be put into finding a suitable hv-generator and engine to run it.